You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cyberbullying and adolescent mental health: systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0102-311x00036114 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara Mota Borges Bottino, Cássio M. C. Bottino, Caroline Gomez Regina, Aline Villa Lobo Correia, Wagner Silva Ribeiro |
| Abstract |
Cyberbullying is a new form of violence that is expressed through electronic media and has given rise to concern for parents, educators and researchers. In this paper, an association between cyberbullying and adolescent mental health will be assessed through a systematic review of two databases: PubMed and Virtual Health Library (BVS). The prevalence of cyberbullying ranged from 6.5% to 35.4%. Previous or current experiences of traditional bullying were associated with victims and perpetrators of cyberbullying. Daily use of three or more hours of Internet, web camera, text messages, posting personal information and harassing others online were associated with cyberbullying. Cybervictims and cyberbullies had more emotional and psychosomatic problems, social difficulties and did not feel safe and cared for in school. Cyberbullying was associated with moderate to severe depressive symptoms, substance use, ideation and suicide attempts. Health professionals should be aware of the violent nature of interactions occurring in the virtual environment and its harm to the mental health of adolescents. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 299 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 3% |
| Researcher | 7 | 2% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 5% |
| Unknown | 218 | 73% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 26 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Unknown | 222 | 74% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,744,239
of 25,534,033 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#76
of 1,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,240
of 271,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,534,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,870 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.