↓ Skip to main content

Prevalência e características dos eventos adversos a medicamentos no Brasil

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalência e características dos eventos adversos a medicamentos no Brasil
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, March 2018
DOI 10.1590/0102-311x00040017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Livia Alves Oliveira de Sousa, Marta Maria de França Fonteles, Mirian Parente Monteiro, Sotero Serrate Mengue, Andréa Dâmaso Bertoldi, Tatiane da Silva Dal Pizzol, Noemia Urruth Leão Tavares, Maria Auxiliadora Oliveira, Vera Lucia Luiza, Luiz Roberto Ramos, Mareni Rocha Farias, Paulo Sergio Dourado Arrais

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of adverse drug events (ADEs) and associated factors reported by users of medicines in Brazil. This was a cross-sectional population-based study conducted from September 2013 to February 2014 with data from the Brazilian National Survey on Access, Use, and Promotion of Rational Use of Medicines (PNAUM). The study included all individuals that reported the use of medicines and identified, among them, all those reporting at least one problem with the medicine's use. A descriptive analysis was performed to estimate ADE prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) among the target variables. Crude and adjusted prevalence ratios were calculated using Poisson regression to investigate factors associated with ADEs. Overall ADE prevalence in Brazil was 6.6% (95%CI: 5.89-7.41), and after multivariate analysis, higher prevalence was associated with female gender, residence in the Central and Northeast regions, consumption of more medicines, "bad" self-rated health, and self-medication. The drugs most frequently reported with ADEs were fluoxetine, diclofenac, and amitriptyline. The most frequent ADEs were somnolence, epigastric pain, and nausea. Most reported ADEs were mild, avoidable, and associated with medicines used frequently by the population. The study provided knowledge on the size of the problem with use of medicines in Brazil.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 25%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 4 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 48 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Chemistry 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 48 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#1,381
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,824
of 344,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#26
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.