You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Análise dos determinantes que influenciam o tempo para o início do tratamento de mulheres com câncer de mama no Brasil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0102-311x00048514 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giselle Coutinho Medeiros, Anke Bergmann, Suzana Sales de Aguiar, Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler |
| Abstract |
This study aimed to analyze the time elapsed between breast cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment in woman treated from 2000 to 2011 in the Brazilian public health system and to identify factors associated with delayed onset of treatment. This retrospective cohort study included 137,593 women diagnosed in 239 hospitals in Brazil from 2000 to 2011. In 63.1% of cases the time between diagnosis and treatment was 60 days. Delayed treatment was associated with nonwhite skin color (OR = 1.18; 95%CI: 1.13-1.23), single marital status (OR = 1.05; 95%CI: 1.01-1.09), less than eight years of schooling (OR = 1.13; 95%CI: 1.08-1.18), early-stage disease (OR = 1.27; 95%CI: 1.22-1.32), treatment from 2006 to 2011 (OR = 1.54; 95%CI: 1.47-1.60), and patients in the public health system (OR = 1.19; 95%CI: 1.13-1.25). Stratified analysis showed variability of factors between regions of Brazil. The identification of factors associated with delayed initiation of breast cancer treatment can support the development of interventions targeted to specific population groups. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 26 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#1,382
of 1,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,510
of 281,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#17
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,855 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.