You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fatores associados à adesão à vacinação anti-influenza em idosos não institucionalizados, São Paulo, Brasil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0102-311x00065414 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roudom Ferreira Moura, Fabíola Bof de Andrade, Yeda Aparecida Oliveira Duarte, Maria Lúcia Lebrão, José Leopoldo Ferreira Antunes |
| Abstract |
The objectives of this study were to estimate influenza vaccination coverage in the elderly and identify factors associated with vaccination uptake. A cross-sectional population-based study was conducted with data collected in 2006 by the Health, Well-Being, and Aging study. The sample consisted of 1,399 elderly in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. The association between vaccine uptake and independent variables was assessed with prevalence ratios, estimated by Poisson regression. Self-reported vaccination was 73.8%. In the final explanatory model, influenza vaccination was associated with older age, presence of chronic diseases, and use of health care in the previous year. A negative association was observed with hospitalization during the previous year. The study concludes that it is necessary to encourage vaccination of elderly less than 70 years of age and those without chronic diseases, as well as to orient health professionals to expand coverage in groups with lower uptake during vaccination campaigns. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,778,510
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#400
of 1,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,309
of 286,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#12
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,855 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.