↓ Skip to main content

Urban upgrading and its impact on health: a “quasi-experimental” mixed-methods study protocol for the BH-Viva Project

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Urban upgrading and its impact on health: a “quasi-experimental” mixed-methods study protocol for the BH-Viva Project
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, November 2015
DOI 10.1590/0102-311x00079715
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amélia Augusta de Lima Friche, Maria Angélica de Salles Dias, Priscila Brandão Dos Reis, Cláudia Silva Dias, Waleska Teixeira Caiaffa

Abstract

There is little scientific evidence that urban upgrading helps improve health or reduce inequities. This article presents the design for the BH-Viva Project, a "quasi-experimental", multiphase, mixed-methods study with quantitative and qualitative components, proposing an analytical model for monitoring the effects that interventions in the urban environment can have on residents' health in slums in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. A preliminary analysis revealed intra-urban differences in age-specific mortality when comparing areas with and without interventions; the mortality rate from 2002 to 2012 was stable in the "formal city", increased in slums without interventions, and decreased in slums with interventions. BH-Viva represents an effort at advancing methodological issues, providing learning and theoretical backing for urban health research and research methods, allowing their application and extension to other urban contexts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Unknown 16 80%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Unknown 16 80%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#410
of 1,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,578
of 294,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#14
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,855 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.