↓ Skip to main content

Prevalência de sibilância e fatores associados em crianças menores de 5 anos de Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brasil

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalência de sibilância e fatores associados em crianças menores de 5 anos de Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brasil
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, September 2013
DOI 10.1590/0102-311x00109012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonia Maria Rosa, Ludmilla da Silva Viana Jacobson, Clóvis Botelho, Eliane Ignotti

Abstract

Wheezing is highly prevalent in Brazil, with variations in rates and risk factors between the regions of the country. This cross-sectional study aimed to analyze the prevalence of wheezing in children under 5 years of age (n = 733) in Cuiabá, Mato Grosso State, Brazil. The study used a brief version of the standardized instrument from the International Study of Wheezing in Infants (EISL). Analysis of factors associated used logistic regression with a hierarchical approach. Prevalence of wheezing in the previous 12 months was 43.2%. Factors associated with wheezing were: lack of at least 6 months of breastfeeding (adjusted OR = 1.91; 95%CI: 1.18-3.06), diagnosis of asthma in the family (adjusted OR = 2.02; 95%CI: 1.06-3.87), current respiratory infection (adjusted OR = 1.81; 95%CI: 1.05-3.14), and male gender (adjusted OR = 1.50; 95%CI: 1.07-2.11). The study concludes that prevalence of wheezing is high among children in this age bracket in Cuiabá and is associated with factors related to allergy, current respiratory infection, and male gender.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 38%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Materials Science 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#1,565
of 1,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,058
of 212,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#20
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,855 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.