↓ Skip to main content

A Convenção-Quadro para o Controle do Tabaco da Organização mundial da Saúde na agenda política brasileira, 2003-2005

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Convenção-Quadro para o Controle do Tabaco da Organização mundial da Saúde na agenda política brasileira, 2003-2005
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, September 2017
DOI 10.1590/0102-311x00121016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luiz Antônio da Silva Teixeira, Carlos Henrique Assunção Paiva, Vanessa Nolasco Ferreira

Abstract

This study analyses the development of a tobacco-control agenda in Brazil following the country's participation in the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO-FCTC). This process started with the diplomatic negotiations for the participation of Brazil in the treaty, in 2003, and its ratification by the National Congress, in 2005, and was marked by substantial controversies between public health players, who are accountable for tobacco-control actions, and the high echelon of Brazilian diplomacy, emissaries of the tobacco industry, representatives of small tobacco farmers from the Southern region of the country, congress representatives, senators and ministers. The study is based on the contributions of John W. Kingdon on the development of an agenda for the formulation of public policies. It took into account secondary references, legislative and institutional sources from the 1995 to 2005 period. It concluded that the association of tobacco-related healthcare actions by technically skilled officials, the involvement of the high echelon of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (policy flow), the initiative for the establishment of the WHO-FCTC (problem flow), and the existence of a favorable environment in both, executive and legislative (political flow), opened a window of opportunity for WHO-FCTC ratification and its inclusion in the government decision agenda.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 15%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 10 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 13 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#1,564
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,455
of 325,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#38
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.