You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Psychoactive substance consumption after the Fundão dam mine tailing disaster in Minas Gerais State, Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0102-311xen237022 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elaine Silva Miranda, Marcelo Dell'Aringa, Everaldo Alves da Costa, Thais Piazza, Francesco Della Corte, Luca Ragazzoni, Francesco Barone-Adesi, Carla Lourenço Tavares de Andrade, Claudia Garcia Serpa Osorio-de-Castro |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,740,846
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#297
of 1,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,739
of 356,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,884 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.