↓ Skip to main content

Falhas vacinais: avaliando vacinas febre amarela, sarampo, varicela e caxumba

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Falhas vacinais: avaliando vacinas febre amarela, sarampo, varicela e caxumba
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, January 2020
DOI 10.1590/0102-311x00008520
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tânia Cristina de Mattos Barros Petraglia, Paula Molinari Cardoso de Mello Farias, Glória Regina Silva E Sá, Eliane Matos Dos Santos, Deborah Araújo da Conceição, Maria de Lourdes de Sousa Maia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 15 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 17 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#443
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,899
of 473,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#44
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.