↓ Skip to main content

O desafio da participação cidadã nos sistemas de saúde do Sul da Europa: uma revisão da literatura

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
O desafio da participação cidadã nos sistemas de saúde do Sul da Europa: uma revisão da literatura
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, January 2017
DOI 10.1590/0102-311x00066716
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Raquel Matos, Mauro Serapioni

Abstract

The current article analyzes existing mechanisms for public participation in health systems in the countries of Southern Europe. Results are presented from a literature review focusing on public participation in health systems, highlighting the potentialities and challenges emerging from the principal national experiences in the respective countries: Spain, Greece, Italy, and Portugal. The article begins by characterizing the health systems, then presents the methodology followed by the results of the analysis in each country, emphasizing the different forms of participation, both institutionalized and non-institutionalized. The study's principal conclusion is that a legislative discourse has prevailed, which in most cases has not materialized in actual participatory practices; meanwhile, non-institutionalized forms of participation have emerged with a special leading role in the health area, featuring protests, largely spurred by the current economic crisis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Social Sciences 3 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,357,897
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#346
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,980
of 422,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.