↓ Skip to main content

Rastreadores para a busca ativa de eventos adversos a medicamentos em recém-nascidos

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rastreadores para a busca ativa de eventos adversos a medicamentos em recém-nascidos
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, September 2018
DOI 10.1590/0102-311x00069817
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra de Carvalho Fabretti, Sandra Cristina Brassica, Marco Antonio Cianciarullo, Nicolina Silvana Romano-Lieber

Abstract

The study aimed to verify the application and performance of triggers for adverse drug events in hospitalized newborns. This prospective cohort study was conducted in the neonatal care units of a university hospital from March to September 2015. A list of triggers was developed for the identification of adverse drug events in this population. The list included antidote, clinical, and laboratory triggers. A total of 125 newborns who had received drugs during the hospitalization were included. Neonatal patient charts were screened to detect triggers. When a trigger was found, the patient chart was reviewed to identify possible adverse drug events. Each trigger's yield in the identification of adverse drug events was calculated and then classified according to its performance. Nine hundred and twenty-five triggers identified 208 suspected adverse drug events. The triggers' overall yield was 22.5%. The most frequently identified triggers were: drop in oxygen saturation, increased frequency of bowel movements, medications stop, and vomiting. The triggers with the best performance in the identification of adverse drug events were: increased creatinine, increased urea, necrotizing enterocolitis, prescription of flumazenil, hypercalcemia, hyperkalemia, hypernatremia, and oversedation. The triggers identified in this study can be used to track adverse drug events in similar neonatal care services, focusing on the triggers with the best performance and the lowest workload in the identification.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 19%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 16 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2019.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#1,564
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,591
of 345,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#31
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.