↓ Skip to main content

Incorporação de Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação e qualidade na atenção básica em saúde no Brasil

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Incorporação de Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação e qualidade na atenção básica em saúde no Brasil
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, June 2017
DOI 10.1590/0102-311x00172815
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alaneir de Fátima dos Santos, Délcio Fonseca, Lucas Lobato Araujo, Cristiane da Silva Diniz Procópio, Érica Araújo Silva Lopes, Angela de Lourdes Dayrell de Maria Lima, Clarice Magalhães Rodrigues dos Reis, Daisy Maria Xavier de Abreu, Alzira Oliveira Jorge, Antonio Thomaz Matta-Machado

Abstract

Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) are means to handle information, streamline communication, and contribute to patient care. This article describes the incorporation of Information and Communication Technologies in primary care and its association with quality, based on the Brazilian National Program for the Improvement of Access and Quality in Primary Care (PMAQ in portuguese). This was a cross-sectional study with 17,053 teams. An Index of Incorporation of ICTs was created, which included: information infrastructure, systems, and utilization. Regression analysis was used to assess associations. Only 13.5% of the teams had a high degree of ICTs. The strongest association was seen in the utilization of information. ICTs can contribute to improving quality of primary care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 7 6%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 38 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 20%
Engineering 6 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 40 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2017.
All research outputs
#15,523,434
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#837
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,308
of 331,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#10
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.