You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Basic questionnaire and methodological criteria for Surveys on Working Conditions, Employment, and Health in Latin America and the Caribbean
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0102-311x00210715 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fernando G Benavides, Pamela Merino-Salazar, Cecilia Cornelio, Ada Avila Assunção, Andrés A Agudelo-Suárez, Marcelo Amable, Lucía Artazcoz, Jonh Astete, Douglas Barraza, Fabián Berhó, Lino Carmenate Milián, George Delclòs, Lorena Funcasta, Johanna Gerke, David Gimeno, María José Itatí-Iñiguez, Eduardo de Paula Lima, David Martínez-Iñigo, Adriane Mesquita de Medeiros, Lida Orta, Javier Pinilla, Fernando Rodrigo, Marianela Rojas, Iselle Sabastizagal, Clelia Vallebuona, Greet Vermeylen, Gloria H Villalobos, Alejandra Vives |
| Abstract |
This article aimed to present a basic questionnaire and minimum methodological criteria for consideration in future Surveys on Working Conditions, Employment, and Health in Latin America and the Caribbean. A virtual and face-to-face consensus process was conducted with participation by a group of international experts who used the surveys available up until 2013 as the point of departure for defining the proposal. The final questionnaire included 77 questions grouped in six dimensions: socio-demographic characteristics of workers and companies; employment conditions; working conditions; health status; resources and preventive activities; and family characteristics. The minimum methodological criteria feature the interviewee's home as the place for the interview and aspects related to the quality of the fieldwork. These results can help improve the comparability of future surveys in Latin America and the Caribbean, which would in turn help improve information on workers' heath in the region. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 7 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 24% |
| Unknown | 32 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2016.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#951
of 1,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,151
of 327,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#22
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,855 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.