↓ Skip to main content

Saúde na Agenda de Desenvolvimento pós-2015 das Nações Unidas

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Saúde na Agenda de Desenvolvimento pós-2015 das Nações Unidas
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, December 2014
DOI 10.1590/0102-311xat011214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulo Marchiori Buss, Danielly de Paiva Magalhães, Andréia Faraoni Freitas Setti, Edmundo Gallo, Francisco de Abreu Franco Netto, Jorge Mesquita Huet Machado, Daniel Forsin Buss

Abstract

This paper evaluates health as a Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) in the context of the Post-2015 Development Agenda, between 2012 and 2014. Health was part of the debate since the Millennium Summit and the MDGs (2000), and it also appears in the documents discussing the Post-2015 Agenda, from the Rio+20 to the Open Working Group (OWG), whose report was submitted to the General Assembly of the United Nations (UNGA) 2014-2015, and in the Global Consultation on Health and the High-Level Panel of Eminent Persons reports. The Authors concluded that the treatment of health in all these documents is uniform. They point out that the scope of the health-related SDG is very comprehensive, but its targets are conceptually fragmented and reduced. They advocate their change as to include not only the idea of social determinants of health, but also targets in the field of public health, which were not included in the proposal of the OWG. They also warn that the global and national governance systems need to be reformed and advocate more participation of the civil society, which can influence diplomacy, which, in turn, will be responsible for the agreement signed at the UNGA in 2015.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 25%
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Researcher 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 12 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 23%
Unspecified 5 10%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 13 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#1,565
of 1,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,263
of 369,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#18
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,855 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.