You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aquatic vascular plants as handicraft: a case study in southern Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Botanica Brasilica, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0102-33062017abb0282 |
| Authors |
Mabel R. Báez-Lizarazo, Flavia Rosa Santoro, Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque, Mara Rejane Ritter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Energy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#291
of 380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,532
of 342,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.