↓ Skip to main content

MINILAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY

Overview of attention for article published in ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo), January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MINILAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
Published in
ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo), January 2016
DOI 10.1590/0102-6720201600010014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lúcio Américo Della Coletta, Bruno Ziade Gil, Renato Morato Zanatto

Abstract

Minilaparoscopy is considered one of the minimally invasive options available for acute appendicitis treatment, although not always employed in less complexity public health services. Report surgical outcomes of minilaparoscopy use in acute appendicitis treatment. The study included 21 patients undergoing minilaparoscopic appendectomy with instrumental of 3 mm. The following variables were analyzed: sex, age, body mass index, stage of appendicitis, surgical time, hospital stay, surgical complications, conversion rate to conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy, pain after surgery and aesthetic result. Twelve men and nine women underwent minilaparoscopic appendectomy. The average age was 27,8 years, the mean BMI was 24,8 kg/m2. The operative time ranged from 33 to 160 min and the average of hospital stay was three days. Among the 21 patients, 20 reported mild pain or no pain in the first postoperative day. The aesthetic result was considered "satisfactory" and "very satisfactory" by 95% of the patients. The minilaparoscopy is viable technique for treating acute appendicitis with a satisfactory recovery. It combines the benefits of minimally invasive procedures with results similar to conventional techniques.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 69 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 21%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 51%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 18 26%