You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Trocas Gasosas do Feijao-Caupi Cultivado no Nordeste Paraense em Resposta à Deficiência Hídrica Forçada Durante a Fase Reprodutiva
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0102-7786351029 |
| Authors |
Paulo de Oliveira Ponte de Jorge Souza, Denilson Pontes Ferreira, Denis de Pinho Sousa, Hildo Giuseppe Garcia Caldas Nunes, Antônio Vinicius Correa Barbosa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,839,027
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia
#3
of 54 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,957
of 383,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 54 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them