↓ Skip to main content

Desempenho de Métodos de Preenchimento de Falhas em Dados de Evapotranspiração de Referência para Região Oeste do Paraná

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Desempenho de Métodos de Preenchimento de Falhas em Dados de Evapotranspiração de Referência para Região Oeste do Paraná
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia, September 2021
DOI 10.1590/0102-77863630001
Authors

Tharsos Hister Giovanella, Fabrício Correia de Oliveira, Vitor Alex de Alves Marchi, Júlia Tluszcz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2021.
All research outputs
#15,590,968
of 25,482,409 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia
#24
of 54 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,679
of 434,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,482,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 54 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.