↓ Skip to main content

Deficiência: palavras, modelos e exclusão

Overview of attention for article published in Saúde em Debate, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deficiência: palavras, modelos e exclusão
Published in
Saúde em Debate, September 2021
DOI 10.1590/0103-1104202113021
Authors

Paulo Henrique dos Santos Mota, Aylene Bousquat

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Postgraduate 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 16%
Social Sciences 3 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Materials Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2022.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Saúde em Debate
#100
of 182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,174
of 433,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Saúde em Debate
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.