You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Topical Intrapocket Anesthesia During Scaling and Root Planing: a Randomized Clinical Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Dental Journal, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0103-6440201300131 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raquel Pippi Antoniazzi, Bruna Cargnelutti, Daniela Napoleão Freitas, Magáli Beck Guimarães, Fabricio Batistin Zanatta, Carlos Alberto Feldens |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 17% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 27 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 42% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Dental Journal
#35
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,025
of 361,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Dental Journal
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them