↓ Skip to main content

Common Operative Procedural Errors and Clinical Factors Associated with Root Canal Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Dental Journal, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Common Operative Procedural Errors and Clinical Factors Associated with Root Canal Treatment
Published in
Brazilian Dental Journal, April 2017
DOI 10.1590/0103-6440201702451
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Estrela, Jesus Djalma Pécora, Cyntia R.A. Estrela, Orlando A. Guedes, Brunno S.F. Silva, Carlos José Soares, Manoel Damião Sousa-Neto

Abstract

Operative procedural errors must be well analyzed in order to avoid influence negatively the root canal treatment (RCT) prognosis. The successful RCT prevents tooth loss and avoids pain and apical periodontitis. This review aimed to categorize common operative procedure errors and clinical factors associated with RCT. Based on this, will be approached common errors of procedures within the clinical operative sequence: endodontic treatment planning, pulp and periapical disease diagnosis, anaesthesia, access cavity preparation, isolation with rubber dam, root canal preparation, root canal filling and retreatment, restoration of endodontically treated teeth, postoperative pain, follow up of endodontically treated teeth. The professional must remind that in each phase of RCT an operative error may have adverse implication on prognosis, and these errors characterize risk factors to failure. The knowledge of probable operative procedural errors and its consequences are essentials to avoid future problems to the tooth health.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 239 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Student > Postgraduate 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 12 5%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 99 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 115 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Computer Science 3 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 <1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 102 43%