You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
One Abutment at One Time Concept for Platform-Switched Morse Implants: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Dental Journal, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0103-6440201801686 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanes Silva Santos, Thiago de Santana Santos, Paulo Ricardo Saquete Martins-Filho, Nadine von Krockow, Paul Weigl, Hess Pablo |
| Abstract |
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the peri-implant vertical bone loss of immediate loading of implant crowns using the one abutment at one time (AOT) protocol and implants with abutment removal (AR). This systematic review with meta-analysis was reported according to the PRISMA statement, with guidance from the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. A total of 103 publications were identified in the PubMed database and reference lists of examined articles. After the screening of titles and abstracts, the eligibility of eight full-text articles was assessed. Five studies published between 2010 and 2015 were included in the meta-analysis. There was less peri-implant vertical bone loss at implants using an AOT protocol than at implants using AR protocol (WMD -0.19, 95% CI -0.26 to -0.13; p<0.0001; random-effects model). In conclusion, the use of the AOT protocol with platform-switched Morse implants results in less bone loss than do AR procedures, but this effect may not be clinically relevant. The preservation of marginal bone level achieved with the AOT protocol may not enhance the aesthetics. These results should be interpreted with caution. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 45 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 47% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 45 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,052,849
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Dental Journal
#6
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,604
of 449,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Dental Journal
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them