↓ Skip to main content

How to Select a Questionnaire with a Good Methodological Quality?

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Dental Journal, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How to Select a Questionnaire with a Good Methodological Quality?
Published in
Brazilian Dental Journal, February 2018
DOI 10.1590/0103-6440201802008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saul Martins Paiva, Matheus de França Perazzo, Fernanda Ruffo Ortiz, Isabela Almeida Pordeus, Paulo Antônio Martins-Júnior

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 14%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 17 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Dental Journal
#197
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#389,408
of 448,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Dental Journal
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.