↓ Skip to main content

Internal inguinal ring closure by laparoscopy using homologous pericardium grafts in horses

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência Rural, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Internal inguinal ring closure by laparoscopy using homologous pericardium grafts in horses
Published in
Ciência Rural, February 2016
DOI 10.1590/0103-8478cr20150042
Authors

Julio David Spagnolo, Idercio Luis Sinhorini, Raquel Yvonne Arantes Baccarin, Aline Magalhães Ambrosio, Maria Teresa de Mello Souto, Keila Kazue Ida, Luis Claudio Lopes Correia da Silva

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#941
of 2,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,609
of 406,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#22
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.