↓ Skip to main content

Phosphorus on performance, hematological, biochemical, and bone parameters of growing pigs

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência Rural, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phosphorus on performance, hematological, biochemical, and bone parameters of growing pigs
Published in
Ciência Rural, April 2016
DOI 10.1590/0103-8478cr20150132
Authors

Jana Euclydes Drews, Douglas Haese, João Luís Kill, Lucas Lemke Lorenzoni, Rafael Bozini Pimentel, Juliano Pelição Molino, Alysson Saraiva, Carolina D'Ávila Possatti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#346
of 2,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,056
of 314,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#7
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,230 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.