↓ Skip to main content

Use of calcareous algae and monensin in Nellore cattle subjected to an abrupt change in diet

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência Rural, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of calcareous algae and monensin in Nellore cattle subjected to an abrupt change in diet
Published in
Ciência Rural, April 2016
DOI 10.1590/0103-8478cr20150278
Authors

Roberta Ferreira Carvalho, Madeline Rezende Mazon, Ana Paula dos Santos Silva, Leticia Silva Oliveira, Claiton André Zotti, Saulo da Luz e Silva, Paulo Roberto Leme

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 15 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#1,057
of 2,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,857
of 314,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#56
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.