You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Yield, water use efficiency, and yield response factor in carrot crop under different irrigation depths
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência Rural, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0103-8478cr20150363 |
| Authors |
Daniel Fonseca de Carvalho, Dionizio Honório de Oliveira, Luiz Fernando Felix, José Guilherme Marinho Guerra, Conan Ayade Salvador |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 82% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 2 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 82% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,659,159
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#105
of 2,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,994
of 315,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#2
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.