You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The incidence and productive significance of ovine toxoplasmosis in Southern Brazil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ciência Rural, May 2016
|
DOI | 10.1590/0103-8478cr20151500 |
Authors |
Fernando Caetano de Oliveira, Plínio Aguiar de Oliveira, Nilton Azevedo da Cunha, Cintia Lidiane Guidotti Aguiar, Felipe Geraldo Pappen, Jeronimo Lopes Ruas, Nara Amélia da Rosa Farias |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 8 | 80% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 8 | 80% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#1,057
of 2,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,427
of 342,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#36
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.