↓ Skip to main content

The optimal number of partial least squares components in genomic selection for pork pH

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência Rural, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The optimal number of partial least squares components in genomic selection for pork pH
Published in
Ciência Rural, November 2016
DOI 10.1590/0103-8478cr20151563
Authors

Fernanda Gomes da Silveira, Darlene Ana Souza Duarte, Lucas Monteiro Chaves, Fabyano Fonseca e Silva, Ivan Carvalho Filho, Marcio de Souza Duarte, Paulo Sávio Lopes, Simone Eliza Facioni Guimarães

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2019.
All research outputs
#16,720,137
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#315
of 2,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,018
of 318,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#3
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,230 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.