You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Different levels of shade on population of grasshoppers and its oviposition preference on heliconias
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência Rural, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0103-8478cr20170371 |
| Authors |
Ana Cristina Bittar, Elen de Lima Aguiar-Menezes, José Guilherme Marinho Guerra, Janaína Ribeiro Costa Rouws, Luiz Augusto de Aguiar, Paulo Sergio da Silva Leite |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2021.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#316
of 2,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,420
of 447,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#4
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.