You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Potentially harmful materials in the feces of wild ring-tailed coatis (Nasua nasua) and health implications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência Rural, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0103-8478cr20210108 |
| Authors |
Delma Henriques Domiciano Rodrigues, Vanner Boere, Clarice Silva Cesario, Waldomiro de Paula Lopes, Alexandre Bartoli Monteiro, Ita Oliveira Silva |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
| Librarian | 1 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 5 | 38% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2022.
All research outputs
#22,774,430
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#1,058
of 2,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#439,918
of 515,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#101
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.