↓ Skip to main content

Different calcium sources on the productive performance and bone quality of meat quail

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência Rural, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different calcium sources on the productive performance and bone quality of meat quail
Published in
Ciência Rural, January 2022
DOI 10.1590/0103-8478cr20210446
Authors

Daniela da Silva Mendonça, Sandra Roseli Valerio Lana, Geraldo Roberto Quintão Lana, Ana Patrícia Alves Leão, Romilton Ferreira de Barros, Luiz Arthur dos Anjos Lima, Iva Carla de Barros Ayres, Daniel Silva Santos, Wilson Araújo da Silva

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 50%
Environmental Science 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2022.
All research outputs
#22,774,430
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#1,058
of 2,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#439,918
of 515,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#101
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,232 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.