↓ Skip to main content

Retrospective evalution of non-fatty solids in samples of raw milk in the state of Rio Grande do Sul according to season, Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência Rural, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retrospective evalution of non-fatty solids in samples of raw milk in the state of Rio Grande do Sul according to season, Brazil
Published in
Ciência Rural, January 2023
DOI 10.1590/0103-8478cr20210592
Authors

Jéssica Aneris Folchini, Diógenes Cecchin Silveira, Adriano Pasqualotti, Simone Meredith Scheffer Basso, Renato Serena Fontaneli, Felipe Balbinot, Carlos Bondan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Chemistry 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2023.
All research outputs
#22,774,430
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#1,058
of 2,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#406,115
of 475,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#38
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,232 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.