You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Historical highlights regarding glanders, from 2007 to 2017, in the state of Maranhão, Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência Rural, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0103-8478cr20210901 |
| Authors |
Ester Clévia dos Santos Vieira, Oswaldo Santos Baquero, Eric Takashi Kamakuru de Carvalho Mesquita, Nancileny Pinto Chaves, Ferdinan Almeida Melo, Ana Karoline Sousa Mendes Simas, Daniel Prazeres Chaves, Viviane Correa Silva Coimbra, José Claudio Araújo Ferreira, Rinaldo Aparecido Mota, Francisco Borges Costa |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#22,778,604
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#1,058
of 2,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#406,141
of 475,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#38
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,232 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.