↓ Skip to main content

A new model for thoracic radiology teaching and research in cadavers of embalmed dogs

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência Rural, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A new model for thoracic radiology teaching and research in cadavers of embalmed dogs
Published in
Ciência Rural, January 2024
DOI 10.1590/0103-8478cr20220456
Authors

Mariana Tiai Kihara, Rafael Chiarelo Zero, Andréa Barros Piazzon de Souza Queiroz, Cauê Pereira Toscano, Daniel Herreira Jarrouge, Thiago André Salvitti de Sá Rocha, Fabrício Singaretti de Oliveira

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#15,736,283
of 25,364,936 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#258
of 2,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,902
of 329,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#23
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,230 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.