You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Influence of low and medium intake supplements in the growing phase of steers grazing in the tropical pasture and finished in feedlot
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência Rural, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0103-8478cr20220661 |
| Authors |
Regis Luis Missio, Saimon de Souza e Souza, Wagner Paris, Jefferson Felipe Cavazzana, Marcelo Machado Severo, Igor Kieling Severo, Julia Maria Poggere, Olmar Antônio Denardin Costa, Rusbel Raul Aspilcueta Borquis, Luis Fernando Glasenapp de Menezes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,841,279
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#114
of 2,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,893
of 332,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#7
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,232 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.