You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolated from cultivated soils using Glycine max L. plants as bait
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ciência Rural, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.1590/0103-8478cr20220684 |
Authors |
Denise Almeida Fonseca Fiuza, Luciana Cristina Vitorino, Cintia Faria da Silva, Natasha Taline dos Santos Trombela, Matheus Vinicius Abadia Ventura, Layara Alexandre Bessa, Edson Luiz Souchie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,020,995
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#263
of 2,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,058
of 356,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#24
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.