↓ Skip to main content

Esophageal and gastric pythiosis in a dog

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência Rural, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Esophageal and gastric pythiosis in a dog
Published in
Ciência Rural, January 2024
DOI 10.1590/0103-8478cr20230272
Authors

Emanoelly Machado Sousa da Silva, Kamila Peruchi Fernandes Martins, Asheley Henrique Barbosa Pereira, Anderson Hentz Gris, Fernanda Harumi Maruyama, Luciano Nakazato, Edson Moleta Colodel, Luiz Gustavo Schneider de Oliveira, Fabiana Marques Boabaid

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,841,279
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#114
of 2,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,893
of 332,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#7
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,232 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.