↓ Skip to main content

NURSING CARE IN BLOOD TRANSFUSION: A TOOL FOR PATIENT MONITORING1

Overview of attention for article published in Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
NURSING CARE IN BLOOD TRANSFUSION: A TOOL FOR PATIENT MONITORING1
Published in
Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem, June 2016
DOI 10.1590/0104-07072016002600015
Authors

Daiana de Mattia, Selma Regina de Andrade

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 22%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 18 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 41%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Unknown 19 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem
#268
of 653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,431
of 355,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 653 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.