↓ Skip to main content

Combined therapy of Ulmo honey (Eucryphia cordifolia) and ascorbic acid to treat venous ulcers1

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combined therapy of Ulmo honey (Eucryphia cordifolia) and ascorbic acid to treat venous ulcers1
Published in
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, April 2015
DOI 10.1590/0104-1169.0020.2550
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariano del Sol Calderon, Carolina Schencke Figueroa, Jessica Salvo Arias, Alejandra Hidalgo Sandoval, Felipe Ocharan Torre

Abstract

to assess the clinical effect of topical treatment using Ulmo honey associated with oral ascorbic acid in patients with venous ulcers. longitudinal and descriptive quantitative study. During one year, 18 patients were assessed who were clinically diagnosed with venous ulcer in different stages, male and female, adult, with a mean injury time of 13 months. Ulmo honey was topically applied daily. The dressing was applied in accordance with the technical standard for advanced dressings, combined with the daily oral consumptions of 500 mg of ascorbic acid. The monitoring instrument is the assessment table of venous ulcers. full healing was achieved in 100% of the venous ulcers. No signs of complications were observed, such as allergies or infection. the proposed treatment showed excellent clinical results for the healing of venous ulcers. The honey demonstrated debriding and non-adherent properties, was easy to apply and remove and was well accepted by the users. The described results generated a research line on chronic wound treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 106 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 23%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 33 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Unspecified 5 5%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 35 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,205,554
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#123
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,842
of 279,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.