↓ Skip to main content

Clinical factors predicting risk for aspiration and respiratory aspiration among patients with Stroke1

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical factors predicting risk for aspiration and respiratory aspiration among patients with Stroke1
Published in
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, April 2015
DOI 10.1590/0104-1169.0197.2545
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Railka de Souza Oliveira, Alice Gabrielle de Sousa Costa, Huana Carolina Cândido Morais, Tahissa Frota Cavalcante, Marcos Venícios de Oliveira Lopes, Thelma Leite de Araujo

Abstract

to investigate the association of risk factors with the Risk for aspiration nursing diagnosis and respiratory aspiration. cross-sectional study assessing 105 patients with stroke. The instrument used to collect data addressing sociodemographic information, clinical variables and risk factors for Risk for aspiration. The clinical judgments of three expert RNs were used to establish the diagnosis. The relationship between variables and strength of association using Odds Ratio (OR) was verified both in regard to Risk for aspiration and respiratory aspiration. risk for aspiration was present in 34.3% of the patients and aspiration in 30.5%. The following stood out among the risk factors: Dysphagia, Impaired or absent gag reflex, Neurological disorders, and Impaired physical mobility, all of which were statistically associated with Risk for aspiration. Note that patients who develop such a diagnosis were seven times more likely to develop respiratory aspiration. dysphagia, Impaired or absent gag reflex were the best predictors both for Risk for aspiration and respiratory aspiration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Student > Master 10 11%
Other 7 8%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 22 24%
Unknown 27 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 36 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 13%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 29 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2017.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#749
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,606
of 279,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.