You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Software development to support decision making in the selection of nursing diagnoses and interventions for children and adolescents1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0104-1169.0302.2633 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenya de Lima Silva, Yolanda Dora Martinez Évora, Camila Santana Justo Cintra |
| Abstract |
to report the development of a software to support decision-making for the selection of nursing diagnoses and interventions for children and adolescents, based on the nomenclature of nursing diagnoses, outcomes and interventions of a university hospital in Paraiba. a methodological applied study based on software engineering, as proposed by Pressman, developed in three cycles, namely: flow chart construction, development of the navigation interface, and construction of functional expressions and programming development. the software consists of administrative and nursing process screens. The assessment is automatically selected according to age group, the nursing diagnoses are suggested by the system after information is inserted, and can be indicated by the nurse. The interventions for the chosen diagnosis are selected by structuring the care plan. the development of this tool used to document the nursing actions will contribute to decision-making and quality of care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 34 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 11% |
| Engineering | 11 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,982,037
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#345
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,023
of 359,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#16
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.