↓ Skip to main content

Prescriptive Authority and Nursing: a comparative analysis of Brazil and Canada

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prescriptive Authority and Nursing: a comparative analysis of Brazil and Canada
Published in
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, December 2015
DOI 10.1590/0104-1169.0418.2650
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Lígia dos Reis Bellaguarda, Sioban Nelson, Maria Itayra Padilha, Jaime Alonso Caravaca-Morera

Abstract

to analyse the differences between medication prescriptions by nurses in Brazil and Ontario, Canada. a comparative study between two different scenarios; this comparison was not performed between the two countries because Canada does not standardize this practice, which is legally established and is considered as an advanced professional knowledge area in Brazil. prescription is a professional position to be occupied by nurses. However, there is tension surrounding this practice because it is perceived as a threat to privileges or traditions of other health professionals. Prescibing medication by nurses in Brazil and Ontario follows current legislation and training proccess in each context. there are some challenges to be overcome in ensuring the visibility and consolidation of the practice by nurses in these realities: guarantee of professional competence, credibility, acceptability, and the respectability of clientele in your professional scope by other health professionals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 31%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 7 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 8 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,777,586
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#143
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,277
of 395,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.