↓ Skip to main content

The development of a risk score for unplanned removal of peripherally inserted central catheter in newborns1

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The development of a risk score for unplanned removal of peripherally inserted central catheter in newborns1
Published in
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, July 2015
DOI 10.1590/0104-1169.0491.2578
Pubmed ID
Authors

Priscila Costa, Amélia Fumiko Kimura, Debra Huffman Brandon, Eny Dorea Paiva, Patricia Ponce de Camargo

Abstract

to develop a risk score for unplanned removal of peripherally inserted central catheter in newborns. prospective cohort study conducted in a neonatal intensive care unit with newborn babies who underwent 524 catheter insertions. The clinical characteristics of the newborn, catheter insertion and intravenous therapy were tested as risk factors for the unplanned removal of catheters using bivariate analysis. The risk score was developed using logistic regression. Accuracy was internally validated based on the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve. the risk score was made up of the following risk factors: transient metabolic disorders; previous insertion of catheter; use of a polyurethane double-lumen catheter; infusion of multiple intravenous solutions through a single-lumen catheter; and tip in a noncentral position. Newborns were classified into three categories of risk of unplanned removal: low (0 to 3 points), moderate (4 to 8 points), and high (≥ 9 points). Accuracy was 0.76. the adoption of evidence-based preventative strategies based on the classification and risk factors faced by the newborn is recommended to minimize the occurrence of unplanned removals.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 17%
Other 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 23 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Psychology 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 12 26%