You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CFD Simulation of an Industrial Reactor for Thermal Cracking of 1,2-Dichloroethane
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0104-6632.20170342s20150520 |
| Authors |
Talles Caio Linhares de Oliveira, Antônio Tavernard Pereira, José Jailson Nicácio Alves, Arioston Araújo de Morais |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 33% |
| Engineering | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2020.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
#183
of 239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,873
of 330,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 239 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.