↓ Skip to main content

Breeding of a high-yield strain for commercial cultivation by crossing Pholiota adiposa

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência e Agrotecnologia, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Breeding of a high-yield strain for commercial cultivation by crossing Pholiota adiposa
Published in
Ciência e Agrotecnologia, January 2021
DOI 10.1590/1413-7054202145010921
Authors

Chengbo Rong, Shuang Song, Li Yang, Xuejiao Pan, Yu Liu, Shouxian Wang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Ciência e Agrotecnologia
#21
of 87 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,531
of 519,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência e Agrotecnologia
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.