You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Zero Hunger and Brazil without Extreme Poverty programs: a step forward in Brazilian social protection policy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1413-812320141911.08812014 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Romulo Paes-Sousa, Jeni Vaitsman |
| Abstract |
Brazilian social protection programs have had consistent effects in reducing poverty and inequality among their respective target-groups: children, adolescents and pregnant and breastfeeding women. In 2011, the Brazil without Extreme Poverty program was launched as a strategy to eradicate extreme poverty by 2014. It makes the promotion of rights the core concept of the official political narrative. This study seeks to provide a systematic description of the Brazil without Extreme Poverty program and its initial results. A review of official documents and academic studies on the social protection programs was conducted. The Brazil without Extreme Poverty program represents an incremental approach to the social protection policies enacted by the previous administration. It advocates a multidimensional and focused approach, funded primarily by the federal government. The strategy subscribes to the international trend of associating social protection with employment and income generation policies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 14% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 30 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,542,307
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#147
of 2,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,026
of 273,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.