↓ Skip to main content

Antidepressivos: uso, adesão e conhecimento entre estudantes de medicina

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antidepressivos: uso, adesão e conhecimento entre estudantes de medicina
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, June 2014
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232014196.06332013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aline Granada Ribeiro, Ligiane Paula da Cruz, Kátia Colombo Marchi, Carlos Renato Tirapelli, Adriana Inocenti Miasso

Abstract

This study assessed the degree of adherence and drug-related awareness and opinions regarding the importance of guidance with respect to treatment among medical students who use antidepressants. It is a cross-sectional descriptive study, carried out in a public Medical School in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Of the 289 students interviewed, 33 (11.4%) use or had already used antidepressants, with fluoxetine being the most prescribed. The nurse was not cited as being responsible for guidance on the antidepressant. Although most students had received guidance on antidepressants, they did not heed guidance and still had doubts regarding their use. There was a statistically significant association regarding the consumption of other drugs in addition to antidepressants and the existence of side effects, as well as regarding an increase of the dosage without medical consultation and the existence of such side effects. Actions are necessary to acknowledge the importance of the teaching of psychopharmacology in the training of the medical professional and for greater harmony between theory and practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 82 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 35%
Professor 5 6%
Student > Master 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 29 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 14%
Psychology 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 29 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#1,775
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,814
of 240,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#18
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.