Title |
Uso, cuidado e política das práticas integrativas e complementares na Atenção Primária à Saúde
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, October 2015
|
DOI | 10.1590/1413-812320152010.00312015 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Octávio Augusto Contatore, Nelson Filice de Barros, Melissa Rossati Durval, Pedro Cristóvão Carneiro da Cunha Barrio, Bernardo Diniz Coutinho, Júlia Amorim Santos, Juliana Luporini do Nascimento, Silene de Lima Oliveira, Silvia Miguel de Paula Peres |
Abstract |
The use of Complementary and Integrative Practices (CIP) is on the increase and its institutionalization in Primary Health Care (PHC) is a challenge. This article discusses the use, care, and policies of CIP at international and national levels found in the indexed literature. A review of the literature in PubMed/Medline and the Virtual Health Library was conducted using the key search words "Homeopathy", "Acupuncture", "Herbal Medicine", "Body Practices", "Primary Health Care" and other related terms in English, Spanish and Portuguese between 2002 and 2011. The use in the literature of CIP for the treatment of specific diseases from a biomedical perspective was observed, as well as evaluations of its use for the treatment of specific diseases focused on the reaction of the users and professionals and the analysis of the political, economic and social viability of CIP in health services. The conclusion drawn is that what is predominant in the literature is the quest for the scientific validation of CIP and a biomedical methodological bias in the designs of the studies, which does not contribute to clarifying the potential care of CIP in PHC. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 15% |
Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 15 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 18% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 9% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 6% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 14 | 41% |