↓ Skip to main content

Alteridade da dor nas práticas de Saúde Coletiva: implicações para a atenção à saúde de pessoas idosas

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alteridade da dor nas práticas de Saúde Coletiva: implicações para a atenção à saúde de pessoas idosas
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, December 2015
DOI 10.1590/1413-812320152012.19382014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wagner Jorge dos Santos, Karla Cristina Giacomin, Josélia Oliveira Araújo Firmo

Abstract

This article seeks to understand the significance attributed by the elderly in the community to their experiences of pain based on the approach given to pain in collective health practices. The survey adopts a qualitative approach of an anthropological nature, grounded on the prerequisites of ethnography. Individual interviews were held, using a semi-structured script, with a universe of 57 elderly people. The Signs, Meanings and Actions methodology oriented the collection and analysis of the data, making possible investigation of the representations and concrete behaviors associated with the experience of pain. There was the sense of the experience of pain in the practice of public health in relation to two analytical categories associated with the health / disease process and care relationships in public health services. The experience of pain modulates the concept of health / disease of respondents and mediates the production of otherness in collective health practices, showing the need of a other-related dialogue that does not always established with the professional care. It is essential that this dialogue happens to be transmuted into care that soothes and comforts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 21%
Student > Master 3 21%
Professor 2 14%
Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 21%
Psychology 2 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 2 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2017.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#1,773
of 2,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#337,486
of 395,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#28
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,035 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.